RanketAI Pricing Explained: Plans, Credits, and Alternatives for an AI Visibility Audit Tool
RanketAI is a Korean-language AI visibility audit tool run by NeoCodeLab. This guide covers the price bands for its Free, Starter, Growth, and Pro plans, how measurement credits work, the three engines it tracks, what the free audit includes, and global and Korean alternatives, based on public sources.
The short answer: read RanketAI pricing through its credit system, not the sticker price
RanketAI publishes its prices, so the basic question has a direct answer. Above the Free plan sit three paid tiers, Starter, Growth, and Pro, and all three fall between the KRW 10,000s and just under KRW 200,000 per month (public list price, VAT included, subject to change)[3]. Most Korean AI visibility tools only quote prices on request, so a public price list is itself part of how RanketAI positions the product[4].
The monthly fee is not the number that should decide a contract. Plans differ in monthly measurement credits, domain count, and history retention, and every competitor comparison burns 2 credits[3]. A Starter subscriber who mostly runs comparisons gets half as many measurements per month. Engine coverage is the other condition the price list does not show: RanketAI tracks three engines, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini[1].
This page covers what RanketAI is, how the plans differ, how credits are deducted, what the free audit includes, where its public materials contradict each other, and which global and Korean alternatives to consider. Price bands reflect public list prices checked in October 2026 and may change.
30-second definitions
- RanketAI is an AI visibility audit SaaS from NeoCodeLab that aims to measure brand exposure in AI answers and recommend page structure fixes[1].
- Page structure audit is RanketAI's free entry feature that aims to check whether a single URL is structured for AI to read and cite[1].
- AI brand visibility analysis is a credit-based measurement feature that aims to confirm whether a brand actually gets mentioned in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini answers[1][3].
- Measurement credit is RanketAI's billing unit that aims to cap measurement workload, such as brand visibility analyses and competitor comparisons, by plan[3].
For the underlying concepts, see What is GEO and What is AEO.
RanketAI's published four-step workflow
The RanketAI homepage lays out the product in four steps: audit, measure, compare, improve. You start with a free page audit, log in to measure brand visibility, see where you stand against competitors, and then work through the fixes[1].
The homepage also says when to expect results. Page structure fixes typically settle in 1 to 4 weeks and external citations in 2 to 8 weeks, and RanketAI advises remeasuring at that point[1]. This is the vendor's own guidance, so treat it as a reference for setting your measurement cadence, nothing more.
RanketAI plan comparison (Free, Starter, Growth, Pro)
The table below reflects the pricing page as checked in October 2026. Prices are shown as bands rather than exact figures; check the official page for current amounts (public list price, VAT included, subject to change)[3].
| Item | Free | Starter | Growth | Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price band | Free | Entry, KRW 10,000s/month | Mid, under KRW 100,000/month | Upper, under KRW 200,000/month |
| Stated audience | Trying out AI exposure | Weekly checks on 1 brand | Daily tracking of 5 domains | Agencies, content teams with multiple brands |
| Domains (monitoring dashboard) | Not included | 1 | 5 | 20 |
| Monthly measurement credits | 3 trial runs | 12 | 80 | 200 |
| History retention | None | 90 days | 365 days | 730 days |
| Monitored pages per domain | Not included | 20 pages | 50 pages | 200 pages |
| Page structure audits | 3/day per IP | 100/day | 500/day | 2,000/day |
| Automatic page structure audit frequency | Not included | Weekly | Daily | Daily |
| Visibility drop alerts | Not included | Not included | Included | Included |
| Competitor comparison | 1 trial run | Up to 2 | Up to 3 | Up to 5 |
| GA integration for AI referral traffic | Not included | Included | Included | Included |
| Search Console funnel analysis | Not included | Not included | Included | Included |
A few terms sit outside the table. Paid subscriptions renew automatically each month, and canceling by 23:59 the day before renewal stops the next charge[3]. No annual plan is listed. Teams that need more domains or measurement volume are pointed to the Enterprise plan, while AI citation reports and a 3-month consulting engagement are handled by separate inquiry[3]. RanketAI's own pricing roundup also lists Enterprise as negotiated separately[4]. The launch article reported the same four tiers, Free, Starter, Growth, and Pro, in the same order (Sport People Times, 2026)[5].
Monthly measurement credits by plan
Credits climb in steps, not in a straight line. Growth gives more than 6 times Starter's allowance, and Pro gives 2.5 times Growth's (RanketAI pricing page, 2026)[3].
| Plan | Value (credits) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | 12 credits | (RanketAI pricing page, 2026) |
| Growth | 80 credits | (RanketAI pricing page, 2026) |
| Pro | 200 credits | (RanketAI pricing page, 2026) |
Evidence: what the public record confirms
- Operator: NeoCodeLab, CEO Lee Jung-min, based in Sejong City (business information in the RanketAI site footer, 2026)[1].
- Launch coverage: An August 2026 article reported NeoCodeLab's official launch of RanketAI and named ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini as its measurement engines (Sport People Times, 2026)[5].
- Measurement engines: The homepage description of brand visibility analysis specifies live measurement on three engines, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini (RanketAI, 2026)[1].
- Page audit criteria: The homepage describes the site audit as a composite of 5 criteria, and its sample screen shows robots.txt, JSON-LD, meta tags, OG tags, and llms.txt (RanketAI, 2026)[1].
- Credit deduction: 1 credit per brand visibility analysis, 2 credits per competitor comparison, add-on credits valid for 60 days (RanketAI pricing page, 2026)[3].
- Self-description: RanketAI's own comparison article presents it as a Korean-language GEO and AEO measurement tool (RanketAI, 2026)[2].
Where the public materials disagree
RanketAI's own pages do not always match. The homepage plan summary lists "unlimited GEO and AEO page audits" and "no login required" under Free, yet the detailed pricing table and FAQ cap page structure audits at 3 per day per IP[1][3]. For Starter's competitor comparison, the homepage says 1 competitor while the pricing page says up to 2[1][3]. Before paying, go by the pricing page, since that is the page with the terms acceptance and the checkout button.
RanketAI vs. alternatives: engine coverage and price bands
Before judging whether RanketAI is a good deal, make sure you are comparing tools that measure the same things. The table below starts from RanketAI's own comparison article, with prices converted to bands[2]. Because a vendor wrote that comparison, verify its Korean-support verdicts for competing products on each official page.
| Tool | Type | Published measurement engines | Korean support | Price band (public list price, subject to change) | Free entry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RanketAI | Korean SaaS | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini[1] | Claims to be Korean-language based[2] | Free to under KRW 200,000/month, Enterprise by inquiry[3] | Free plan |
| Otterly.AI | Overseas SaaS | ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Bing, Google AI Mode, Gemini[2] | Classified as English-centric UI in the comparison article[2] | Entry, from tens of dollars per month[2] | 14-day trial[2] |
| Peec AI | Overseas SaaS | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and others[2] | Classified as English-centric UI in the comparison article[2] | Entry, from under $100/month[2] | 7-day trial[2] |
| Profound | Overseas SaaS | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and many others[2] | Classified as English-centric UI in the comparison article[2] | Full-service, from hundreds of dollars per month[2] | None per the comparison article[2] |
| Bluedot Intelligence | Korean | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity[2] | Supported[2] | Inquiry[2] | None per the comparison article[2] |
| BOIDA BVI | Korean | Multiple engines including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek[6] | Korean supported | Inquiry[6] | Inquiry |
The table shows a coverage gap more than a price gap. RanketAI lowered the barrier to entry with public pricing but limited itself to three engines. Overseas tools cover more engines but bill in dollars, and other Korean tools mostly quote prices on request[4]. BOIDA, run by Designovel, says its BVI (Brand Visibility Index) ranks brand visibility at the category level, with pricing by inquiry[6]. For the full Korean market, see Korean AI visibility tool comparison.
Analysis: why the credit system changes what you actually pay
RanketAI's price list looks simple, but how far a plan goes depends on how you use it, because each feature costs a different number of credits. Spend Starter's 12 monthly credits only on brand visibility analyses and you get 12 runs; spend them only on competitor comparisons and you get 6[3]. A team that wants weekly comparisons against two competitors will struggle to last a month on Starter.
History retention matters too. Starter's 90 days is enough to follow quarterly trends, but year-over-year comparisons need the 365 days that come with Growth or higher[3]. In seasonal categories like fashion and beauty, that gap can weigh more than the difference in price.
Credits do not fix engine coverage. The public materials list three measurement engines, and Claude, Google AI Overviews, and Naver AI Briefing are not among them[1][5]. Scores for the same brand shift with the engine and the query set, a problem covered in Measurement discrepancies across AI visibility tools and Multi-engine measurement. The practical takeaway: list the engines your customers actually use, confirm that list fits within RanketAI's three, and only then pick a plan.
Action: what to check before adopting RanketAI
- Start with the free page audit. Without logging in, run your key page URLs and check the state of robots.txt, JSON-LD, and meta tags. The free limit is 3 audits per day per IP[3].
- Match the engine list. Write down the AI engines your customers use and decide how much the surfaces outside ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini matter[1].
- Estimate monthly measurement volume. Multiply brand analyses by 1 and competitor comparisons by 2, then add them; the total is your monthly credit need[3].
- Narrow the plan by history length. Quarterly trends point to Starter; annual comparisons point to Growth or higher[3].
- Resolve the conflicting figures. Confirm the free audit limit and Starter's competitor comparison count against the pricing page, by inquiry if needed[1][3].
- Decide whether to pair it with another tool. If visibility on Naver, Claude, or Google AI Overviews matters, split the job across tools. For the full cost range, see GEO tool pricing overview; for free audit tools, see Free AI visibility audit tools compared.
| Situation | Plan to consider | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| 1 brand, a few checks a month | Starter | 1 domain, 12 credits, 90-day retention[3] |
| Several brands, drop alerts needed | Growth | 5 domains, daily automatic audits, drop alerts[3] |
| Agency running multiple brands | Pro | 20 domains, 200 credits, 730-day retention[3] |
| Over the measurement cap, separate reports needed | Enterprise inquiry | Custom plan, AI citation reports, consulting billed separately[3] |
Wrap-up
RanketAI is one of the few Korean AI visibility audit tools that publishes its prices. Its four tiers run from free to under KRW 200,000 per month, and the real differences come down to credits, domains, and history. Two conditions deserve a check before you sign: competitor comparisons cost 2 credits, and only three engines are tracked. The homepage and pricing page disagree in places, so treat the pricing page as the reference. For broader selection criteria, see AI visibility tool recommendations and AI visibility monitoring tools compared; for the company-level view, see Recommended GEO companies.
Related companies
- 보이다 (BOIDA)생성형 검색 최적화(GEO) 솔루션, AI 가시성 측정
- 블루닷 (Bluedot, 블루닷 인텔리전스)AI 검색 최적화(GEO, AEO) 분석, 실행 플랫폼
- Otterly.aiAI 가시성 모니터링 툴
- Peec AIAI 가시성 모니터링 플랫폼
- ProfoundAI 가시성 모니터링 플랫폼
Frequently asked questions
- RanketAI is run by NeoCodeLab (CEO Lee Jung-min), a company registered in Sejong City, South Korea. The official site describes RanketAI as a platform for measuring and improving brand visibility in AI answers and as a GEO and AEO audit service (RanketAI, 2026).
- According to the official pricing page, Free costs nothing and there are three paid tiers: Starter (in the KRW 10,000s per month), Growth (under KRW 100,000 per month), and Pro (under KRW 200,000 per month). All are monthly subscriptions with VAT included. Teams that need more domains or measurement volume move to an Enterprise inquiry. List prices change, so confirm before paying (RanketAI pricing page, 2026).
- Each AI brand visibility analysis uses 1 credit and each competitor comparison uses 2. Monthly allowances are 12 credits on Starter, 80 on Growth, and 200 on Pro. Once they run out, you can buy 10-credit or 40-credit add-ons, which stay valid for 60 days (RanketAI pricing page, 2026).
- Per the pricing page, the page structure audit runs 3 times a day per IP without logging in. After login you get 3 trial brand visibility analyses, 1 trial competitor comparison, and 2 trial brand recommendation opportunity questions. The summary table on the homepage says page audits are unlimited, so the two pages disagree (RanketAI, 2026).
- The official homepage and the launch article list three measurement engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Claude, Google AI Overviews, and Naver AI Briefing are not on the public list. If those surfaces matter to you, confirm through a demo or inquiry and pair RanketAI with another tool (RanketAI, Sport People Times, 2026).
- No. The tool's vendor wrote it, so it has a stake in the outcome. Its single table of 13 tools is useful for scanning prices and trial terms, but verdicts such as whether a competitor supports Korean should be checked on each vendor's official page (RanketAI, 2026).
Q.Who makes RanketAI?
Q.How much does RanketAI cost?
Q.How are RanketAI measurement credits deducted?
Q.What does the RanketAI free plan include?
Q.Does RanketAI track Naver AI Briefing or Claude?
Q.Can RanketAI's own comparison article be treated as neutral?
Sources
- [1] ↑RanketAI, AI 검색 가시성 진단 GEO, AEO 최적화 플랫폼 — RanketAI
- [2] ↑AI 가시성 측정 도구 비교 2026, GEO, AEO 진단 SaaS 총정리 — RanketAI
- [3] ↑요금제, AI 가시성 모니터링 플랜 — RanketAI
- [4] ↑한국 AI 가시성 진단 도구 가격 비교, 무료부터 엔터프라이즈까지 (2026) — RanketAI
- [5] ↑네오코드랩, AI 답변 속 브랜드 노출을 측정하는 RanketAI 정식 출시 — 스포츠피플타임즈
- [6] ↑BOIDA BVI, Brand Visibility Index — 디자이노블
Related documents
- Korea AI Visibility Tools Compared: SOHA, OPTIGEO, ChainShift, RanketAI 2026A side-by-side comparison of SOHA, OPTIGEO, ChainShift, RanketAI, and BOIDA (BVI) across engine count, diagnostic depth, domestic platform support, and execution integration: with concrete selection criteria for Korea B2B SaaS environments.
- Free GEO Audit Tools Compared 2026: Where to Get a Free AI Search Visibility Check, 9 Korean and Global OptionsFree GEO audits come in three shapes, self-serve scans, free trials of paid products, and assisted reports from agencies. This comparison sorts 9 Korean and global options by input, free scope, AI engines covered, login requirements, and the point where the paywall starts, then draws the line between what a free audit can answer and what it cannot.
- GEO & AI Visibility Tool Pricing: A Public-Price RoundupA single-table comparison of GEO and AEO tool pricing. We line up the public prices of global monitoring tools: from Otterly at $29 to Profound Lite at $499 and Gauge at $599, and explain why Korean solutions and agencies run on quotes and undisclosed pricing, plus what to watch when you scope a budget.
- AI Visibility Monitoring Tools Compared 2026: Profound, Peec, Otterly, ScrunchA neutral comparison of AI visibility monitoring tools that measure how often your brand surfaces in generative engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity: by price, engine coverage, target, and differentiation. Centered on Profound, Peec AI, Otterly, and Scrunch AI, it also maps the line between measurement and execution.
- AI Visibility Tools Compared: Profound, Peec, Otterly, and BOIDA: A Situation-Based Guide for 2026Not every AI visibility monitoring tool fits every team. Here's how Profound, Peec AI, Otterly, Scrunch AI, and BOIDA BVI stack up by use case: from first-time GEO measurement to Korean-language campaigns and enterprise multi-engine coverage.
- Why AI Visibility Tools Report Different Scores for the Same Brand: Causes and a Verification ProcedureWhy the same brand scores differently in every AI visibility tool, split into four layers (engine variance, collection design, metric definition, aggregation), with a side-by-side table of the published formulas from Profound, Peec AI, and Ahrefs, sample-size confidence interval thresholds, and a six-step verification procedure.
- Multi-Engine Measurement: How to Measure Visibility Across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and ClaudeWhy every engine answers differently, the trap of single-engine measurement, and a multi-engine GEO methodology for measuring AI visibility through prompt sets, repetition, and share of voice.
- Best GEO/AEO Companies: Domestic & Global Agencies and Solutions Comparison Guide 2026A comprehensive answer to 'which GEO companies are worth recommending.' Compares domestic Korean (Intermajor, ZESTCOMPANY, Narr/Answer, BizSpring, etc.) and global monitoring tools, diagnosis solutions, and agencies by founding, headquarters, and differentiators.