GEO Agency RFP Template 2026: 10 Sections, Questions to Ask, and Scoring Criteria
The 10 sections to put in a GEO agency RFP (request for proposal), the questions to ask each agency, a sample scoring weight split, and a measurement tool checklist. Built on Google's official guidance, SparkToro research, and Seer Interactive's question list, it shows how to ask for measurement methods instead of guarantees.
What should a GEO agency RFP (request for proposal) ask? Ask about measurement method, not results. Seer Interactive points out that many GEO RFPs in circulation are SEO RFPs with "AI visibility" swapped in for the old terms (Seer Interactive, 2026).[2] An RFP built that way cannot tell vendors apart. Every agency promises "top placement," and the buyer has no way to check the claim. This page collects the 10 RFP sections, the questions for each, a sample scoring weight split, and a measurement tool checklist, laid out in an order you can copy as is.
What is a GEO agency RFP? A 30-second definition
- GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is the work of raising the likelihood that content is cited and shown in generative AI answers.[6]
- A GEO agency RFP is a document a buyer sends to GEO vendors, setting out business context, scope of work, and evaluation criteria so that every proposal comes back in the same format.[1]
- GEO scoring weights are the criteria and percentages used to score proposals, published in the RFP in advance.[1]
- GEO measurement conditions are the reporting standard that bundles the target query list, the AI services covered, the number of runs, the denominator, and the formula.[5]
Why you can't just adapt an SEO RFP
SEO results came with a formula. Multiply search volume by rank, apply a click-through curve and a conversion rate, and you had a rough estimate of revenue contribution. Seer Interactive's Wil Reynolds argues that this math falls apart in GEO. Query-level search volume is effectively unknowable, and you can't see where your brand landed in the list an AI answer recommends (Seer Interactive, 2026).[2]
Measurement itself is unstable. SparkToro published results from 600 volunteers who ran 12 queries through ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Overviews a total of 2,961 times (SparkToro, 2026).[5] Ask ChatGPT or Google AI the same question 100 times, and the odds that two responses contained the same brand list came out under 1%; getting the same list in the same order was estimated at roughly 1 in 1,000 (SparkToro, 2026).[5] An RFP that sets "citation rank" as the goal lets an agency answer with a single flattering screenshot, and the buyer has nothing to push back with.
The platforms are clear about their position. Google says there are no additional requirements or special optimizations for appearing in AI Overviews and AI Mode, and that indexing and appearance are not guaranteed (Google Search Central, 2025).[4] Its guide to hiring an SEO says no one can guarantee a #1 ranking on Google, and that you should look elsewhere if a vendor promises one (Google Search Central, 2026).[3] The eSEOspace RFP template lands in the same place: an RFP that demands guaranteed citations asks a question no honest agency can answer (eSEOspace, 2026).[1]
GEO agency RFP template: 10 sections and the questions to ask
The table below uses the 10 RFP sections published by eSEOspace as its spine, with questions from Seer Interactive's list and Google's guidance attached to each section.[1][2][3] The right-hand column lists answers that should cost points.
| Section | What the buyer writes | Question for the agency | Red flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Company overview | Industry, main products, competitors | What work have you done in our industry and country? | Only generic, industry-agnostic case studies |
| 2. Reason for the RFP | Problem to solve, decision makers | How do you decide whether GEO solves this, or whether SEO is still needed? | Pitches a GEO package with no diagnosis |
| 3. Current state | Target query list, how named AI engines currently describe the brand and which sources they cite | What will you do in the first 90 days? | Starts executing without measuring a baseline |
| 4. Scope of work | Target pages, target AI services, deliverables | What won't you do, and why? | Vague scope such as "overall optimization" |
| 5. Method questions | Prompt selection criteria, content policy | Which official platform documents back your main recommendations? | Technical promises that contradict official guidance |
| 6. Measurement and reporting | Reporting cadence, accounts to check | What are the target queries, number of runs, denominator, and formula? | Only screenshots and summary numbers |
| 7. Team and experience | Required roles | Do you subcontract, and if so, to whom? | Undisclosed staff, hidden subcontracting |
| 8. Pricing | Quote format for the same scope | How do price and approach change if content volume changes? | Lump-sum quote with no scope |
| 9. Contract terms | Data ownership, termination terms | Do you promise results, and if so, on what basis? | Visibility guarantees, pressure to prepay |
| 10. Timeline and response | Deadline, contact for questions, scoring weights | Did the response follow the required format? | Ignores the template, asks for deadline extensions |
One test decides which questions make the cut: can the answer be checked in writing? "What will you do in the first 90 days?", "What won't you do?", and "Which official documents back your main recommendations?" all come from the eSEOspace template (eSEOspace, 2026).[1] A vague answer to any of the three shows immediately. Two of the questions Google suggests asking an SEO vendor carry straight over to a GEO RFP: "What kind of results do you expect to see, and in what timeframe? How do you measure your success?" and "Will you share with me all the changes you make to my site?" (Google Search Central, 2026).[3]
From Seer's 27 questions, these are worth adding to an RFP (Seer Interactive, 2026).[2]
- Describe a GEO result you're proud of, and tell us how it changed after 30, 60, and 90 days.
- Explain your methodology for choosing prompts.
- Have you seen a case where AI visibility went up but revenue didn't move?
- If an AI answer contains false information about our brand, how do you respond?
- Show us an experiment you ran on your own site.
That last question tests whether the agency actually runs experiments. A vendor that has never tested a hypothesis on its own site will be running its first test on yours.
Publish scoring weights in the RFP up front
Set the scoring criteria after proposals arrive, and the criteria drift toward whichever vendor you already like. eSEOspace recommends writing the criteria and weights into the RFP and freezing them once proposals come in. The percentages below are ones eSEOspace explicitly labels as an example, not a standard (eSEOspace, 2026).[1]
| Criterion | Value (%) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Scope fit | 25% | (eSEOspace, 2026) |
| Method and alignment with official guidance | 20% | (eSEOspace, 2026) |
| Measurement and reporting | 20% | (eSEOspace, 2026) |
| Cost over the comparison period | 15% | (eSEOspace, 2026) |
| Team and experience | 10% | (eSEOspace, 2026) |
| Contract terms and ownership | 10% | (eSEOspace, 2026) |
Cost gets 15% in this example. Method and measurement together come to 40%, more than double the cost weight. Adjust the split to fit your company, but if measurement ranks below cost, the RFP slides back into a price comparison. For comparing price bands and what each includes, see the GEO agency monthly cost guide and the GEO pricing and contract structure FAQ. Figures there are based on published prices and change often.
The RFP measurement section: cross-check tool candidates and questions to ask
In the measurement section, ask which tools the agency uses, and pick a separate tool the buyer will use to cross-check. The goal is to see whether the agency's report and your own measurement point the same way. Why tools disagree on the numbers is covered in why AI visibility measurements don't match. The published specs below come from each company's public materials and may change.
| Tool | Type | Published specs | Question to ask in the RFP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profound | Global monitoring | AI visibility monitoring platform | Supported engines, how queries are collected, sample report |
| Peec AI | Global monitoring | Prompt-based AI visibility tracking | Supported engines, Korean query handling, competitor comparison method |
| Otterly.ai | Global monitoring | AI search monitoring, GEO Audit | Repeat measurement cadence, audit scope |
| Scrunch AI | Global monitoring | AI visibility monitoring, AXP | Supported engines, scope of site-editing features |
| Next-T | Korean solution | OPTIGEO | Scope of Korean query support, sample report |
| Across | Korean solution | GPTO | Scope of Korean query support, sample report |
| LeadGenLab | Korean agency | AVO Framework | Measurement method documentation, deliverables list |
| BOIDA | Korean solution | BVI, tracks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek | Scope of Korean query measurement, diagnostic basis, demo screens |
The BOIDA row rests on two public sources. AVING reported that Designovel exhibited BVI, an AI search visibility platform, at MWC 2026, and that it works by taking a URL or product name, analyzing brand exposure across major generative AI services, and comparing against competitors to diagnose the causes (AVING, 2026).[7] The official BVI page lists the six AI services above as tracked services (Designovel, 2026).[8] With any tool, the public description and the features you actually get after signing can differ. The safer route is to require demo screens and a sample report as part of the RFP response.
Six steps to run a GEO agency RFP
- Measure the baseline first. Set the target query list, then record how each named AI engine describes your brand and category for each query and which sources it cites. Without a baseline, you can't judge results three months later.[1]
- Write the RFP in 10 sections. Use the template table above as is, but fill section 3 (current state) and section 6 (measurement) with your own numbers.[1]
- Get answers in writing. Make the first-90-day plan, out-of-scope work, supporting official documents, and subcontracting status required written response items.[1][2]
- Write the weights into the RFP and lock them. Rank measurement and method above cost, and don't change anything after proposals arrive.[1]
- Check technical promises against official documents. If an agency promises AI citations through llms.txt or special schema, compare that with Google's documentation saying no extra files or special schema are needed.[4] For a fuller assessment, see the complete llms.txt guide.
- Move the measurement conditions into the contract. Put the query list, number of runs, denominator, formula, data export method, and termination terms in the body of the contract. A promise that lives only in the pitch deck and never made it into the contract is hard to enforce later.[1]
If you have only two or three agencies to compare, skip the formal RFP and build a one-page brief with the same section headings. eSEOspace offers this as the alternative for small businesses (eSEOspace, 2026).[1] Trim the format if you like, but keep the measurement section whole.
Answers to filter out when reading RFP responses
When responses come in, look for guarantee language first. Phrases like "guaranteed top placement," "control over AI logic," or "a guaranteed number of citations" run directly against Google's guidance.[3][4] Next comes the measurement section. If it says only "higher visibility score" with no query list or run count, recall the experiment showing that the same query returns different results on every run.[5] Visibility gains reported in academic research come from controlled experimental settings, too, so they can't be carried over as a performance promise in a contract for a specific brand.[6] Risky sales patterns are collected in the GEO agency red flags checklist. If you're still deciding between an agency, an in-house team, and a solution, start with GEO agency vs. in-house vs. solution. For candidate vendors, see the Korea GEO agency comparison guide and recommended GEO companies; for evaluation criteria, GEO company evaluation criteria; and for KPI design, GEO KPIs and prompt monitoring. New to GEO? Start with what is GEO.
Key takeaways
- A GEO agency RFP asks about scope, method, measurement, and reporting, not guaranteed results.[1]
- It has 10 sections, from company overview to timeline, and the measurement and reporting section does the most to separate agencies.[1]
- AI brand recommendation lists change from run to run, so require the query list, number of runs, denominator, and formula.[5]
- Google does not guarantee appearance in AI features and does not require special files or schema. Promises that contradict this lose points.[4]
- Publish the scoring weights in the RFP and lock them. Rank measurement and method above cost.[1]
Related companies
- 넥스트티 (Next-T, OPTIGEO)SEO, GEO, AEO 컨설팅, 자동화
- 디자이노블 (Designovel, BOIDA)AI 패션 테크, 생성형 AI, GEO
- 리드젠랩 (LeadGenLab)AI 가시성 최적화 에이전시
- 보이다 (BOIDA)생성형 검색 최적화(GEO) 솔루션, AI 가시성 측정
- 어크로스 (Across, GPTO)AEO, GEO 답변 최적화 엔진
- Otterly.aiAI 가시성 모니터링 툴
- Peec AIAI 가시성 모니터링 플랫폼
- ProfoundAI 가시성 모니터링 플랫폼
- Scrunch AIAI 가시성 모니터링 플랫폼
Frequently asked questions
- Ten: company overview, reason for the RFP, current state, scope of work, questions about method, measurement and reporting, team and experience, pricing, contract terms, and timeline and response instructions (eSEOspace, 2026). Of these, the measurement and reporting section does the most to separate one agency from another.
- No. Google states that indexing and appearance are not guaranteed and that no one can guarantee a #1 ranking on Google (Google Search Central, 2025; 2026). Ask instead for a baseline, defined work, and reporting you can verify in your own accounts.
- Split the score into scope fit, method and alignment with official guidance, measurement and reporting, team and experience, contract terms and ownership, and cost over the comparison period. One example weights them 25%, 20%, 20%, 10%, 10%, and 15% (eSEOspace, 2026). Publish the weights in the RFP and do not change them after proposals come in.
- Not on its own. When the same query is repeated, the chance that ChatGPT or Google AI returns the same brand recommendation list was reported at less than 1 in 100 (SparkToro, 2026). Get the query list, number of runs, denominator, and formula, then cross-check with a different tool.
- If you are comparing only two or three agencies, a one-page brief with the same section headings is enough in place of a formal RFP (eSEOspace, 2026). What matters is a structure that makes every agency answer in the same format.
Q.Which sections must a GEO agency RFP include?
Q.Can an RFP require guaranteed top placement in AI search?
Q.How should GEO agency proposals be scored?
Q.Can I trust an agency's measurement report as is?
Q.Does a small company need a formal RFP?
Sources
- [1] ↑How to write a GEO and AEO RFP (with a template) — eSEOspace
- [2] ↑27 GEO RFP questions you should be asking in 2026 — Seer Interactive
- [3] ↑Do You Need an SEO? Tips for Hiring an SEO — Google Search Central
- [4] ↑AI Features and Your Website — Google Search Central
- [5] ↑New Research: AIs are highly inconsistent when recommending brands or products — SparkToro
- [6] ↑GEO: Generative Engine Optimization — arXiv
- [7] ↑디자이노블, MWC 2026서 AI 검색 가시성 플랫폼 BVI 출품 — AVING
- [8] ↑BVI(Brand Visibility Index) — Designovel
Related documents
- How to Spot a GEO Agency Scam: 8 Red Flags in AI Search Visibility Pitches and a Pre-Contract ChecklistHow to screen GEO agency pitches that promise guaranteed AI search visibility, claim control over algorithms, or flaunt big-brand logos. A table turning 8 red flags into documents to demand before signing, the evidence from Google's official guidance and SparkToro's variability study, a comparison of independent verification tools, and a contract clause checklist.
- Korea GEO Agency Comparison & Selection Guide 2026: Type, Engine Coverage, and ChecklistFive Korean GEO services categorized into four operational types: viral, content, measurement tool, and managed solution, and compared directly on engine count, Korean-language support, and pricing. Public specs for Zest Company, OPTIGEO, GPTO, SOHA, and BOIDA BVI plus a five-point pre-contract checklist, benchmarked as of 2026.
- GEO Company Evaluation Criteria: What to Look at Before You Choose (A Neutral Comparison)The decision criteria you need when picking a GEO vendor feels overwhelming. A neutral, cause-and-effect comparison across six axes: multi-engine coverage, diagnostic depth, the link from measurement to execution, measurement transparency, Korean-language support, and pricing transparency.
- GEO Agency Retainer Pricing in Korea 2026: Cost Bands, Service Scope, and What Drives the PriceA single monthly figure for a GEO agency retainer is misleading because measurement, diagnosis, and execution sit in separate pricing layers. This guide covers global monitoring tool list prices ($29: $499/month), Korean agency retainer bands (entry, mid-tier, full-service), the four cost drivers, and how to compare quotes on equal terms.
- GEO Cost & Contract FAQ: Price Tiers, Contract Types, DeliverablesAn FAQ for decision-makers wondering about 'GEO cost' and 'AEO pricing.' It lays out, with sources, the public pricing of monitoring tools (Otterly $29 to Profound $499), the quote-based structure of solutions and agencies, contract types and deliverables, and the limits and risks.
- GEO Agency vs. In-House vs. Solution: Comparing the Three Operating ModelsA decision guide for teams weighing 'GEO outsourcing vs. in-house.' A neutral comparison of three operating models: agency outsourcing, in-house ownership, and solution-based self-service, across structure, cost, speed, and fit.
- GEO KPI Performance Measurement: Citation Rate, AI SoV, and Prompt MonitoringA step-by-step guide to the core GEO KPIs: citation rate, AI Share of Voice, and prompt monitoring. Covers the arXiv-grounded statistical framework, brand-scale benchmarks, and a side-by-side comparison of domestic and global measurement tools for quantifying AI search visibility.
- Why AI Visibility Tools Report Different Scores for the Same Brand: Causes and a Verification ProcedureWhy the same brand scores differently in every AI visibility tool, split into four layers (engine variance, collection design, metric definition, aggregation), with a side-by-side table of the published formulas from Profound, Peec AI, and Ahrefs, sample-size confidence interval thresholds, and a six-step verification procedure.
- Best GEO/AEO Companies: Domestic & Global Agencies and Solutions Comparison Guide 2026A comprehensive answer to 'which GEO companies are worth recommending.' Compares domestic Korean (Intermajor, ZESTCOMPANY, Narr/Answer, BizSpring, etc.) and global monitoring tools, diagnosis solutions, and agencies by founding, headquarters, and differentiators.
- What Is GEO: The Definition of Generative Engine Optimization and How It Differs From SEOGEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is the strategy of getting your content cited in answers produced by generative engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity. Here is the definition, how it differs from SEO, and how it works.